Legal Opinion

Adams, Rowe & Norman, Inc. v. Bowles

Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1944No. 110PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGRUDER, Judge.

We have to decide in this case whether the Price Administrator is authorized, under the provisions of the Emergency Price Control Act, 56 Stat. 23, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 901 et seq., to regulate the rents charged for company housing units rented to employees; and if so, whether the rent regulations in question, on the particular facts disclosed, are invalid insofar as they determine the maximum rents for complainants’ company houses by reference to the same maximum rent date that is used to fix the maximum rents for housing accommodations generally in the two defense-rental…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Coke Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Hillcrest Terrace Corporation v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Northwood Apartments, Inc. v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Bibb Mfg. Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Heinz v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Ben H. Rosenthal & Co. v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Kuskin & Rotberg, Inc. v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Dixie Pine Products Co. v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  5. 315 West 97th Street Realty Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API