Legal Opinion
Kuskin & Rotberg, Inc. v. Porter
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 1946No. 262PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McAllister, judge.
In this case, we are concerned with the construction to be given Section 5(a) (11) 1 of the Housing Regulation which provides for an increase of maximum rent otherwise allowable, on the ground that the rent on the date determining the maximum rent was materially affected by peculiar circumstances and, as a result, was substantially lower than the rent generally prevailing in the defense-rental area for comparable housing accommodations on the maximum rent date.
Complainant, the owner of an apartment building located in East Orange, New Jersey, leased three apartments in July…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Chatlos v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Lakemore Co. v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Hillcrest Terrace Corporation v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Northwood Apartments, Inc. v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sucesión de Bernat v. PeñagarícanoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- 4732 Washington Apartments, Inc. v. CreedonEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
- Hotel Enterprises v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Fairmac Corp. v. RobertsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Torre v. BerkowitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.