Legal Opinion · Concurrence
State v. Session
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 3, 1989No. C-2859; CA A48317PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1ConcurrenceEdmonds, J.
I concur with the majority only because a panel of this court has held in a companion case on the same fact, that State v. Ainsworth, 95 Or App 240, 770 P2d 58, rev allowed 308 Or 158 (1989), controls. State v. Gohring, 95 Or App 746, 770 P2d 614 (1989). Were it not for that fact, I would hold that the facts of this case are distinguishable from Ainsworth.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. AinsworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. GohringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. GohringOregon Supreme Court · 1991