Flournoy v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
Petitioner Larry Flournoy appeals the denial of postconviction relief for his conviction for first-degree murder. Flournoy alleges a variety of errors and argues that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant an evidentiary hearing on his postcon-viction petition on six grounds: 1) he was denied due process because the trial judge met secretly with other judges and decided to impanel anonymous juries in Flournoy’s and related defendants’ cases; 2) he was denied due process because a prosecution witness has recanted her testimony; 3) he was denied the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Hodgson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. YangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. TurnageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. TurnageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007