Legal Opinion
Pyle v. Pyle
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 29, 1951PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
53 So.2d 312 (1951)
PYLE
v.
PYLE et ux.
Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.
June 29, 1951.
M.C. Scofield and Chas. B. Fitzpatrick, Inverness, for appellant.
Lovick P. Williams, Inverness, for appellees.
ROBERTS, Justice.
The plaintiff-appellant filed suit in the court below seeking to have declared in her favor a resulting trust as to certain property purchased by her deceased husband during his lifetime. The plaintiff named as parties defendant the son of her deceased husband, and the son's wife, and alleged that she and her step-son were the only heirs-at-law of the decedent, who died intestate.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pepple v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Foster v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Frank v. EelesSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- Hinshaw v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ball v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Higbee v. DorigoSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- STATE, DEPT. OF REV. v. Zuckerman-Vernon Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Davis v. DieujusteSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Abreu v. AmaroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.