Legal Opinion · Dissent

Warm Springs Forest Products Industries v. Employee Benefits Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1986No. TC A8010-05866; CA A24017; SC S32081Published

1DissentCarson, J.

The majority holds that the written insurance contract evidenced a choice by the parties to have Oregon law apply to all aspects of the transaction. I do not believe that this conclusion can be reached from the record before us and the procedural posture of this case. However, if the majority is correct on that point, Warm Springs law would not apply to this case, and it is neither necessary for the court to consider what the applicable law of Warm Springs is, nor appropriate to reach conclusions about that issue, the status of which largely was undeveloped by the parties. Further, I disagree…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Casey v. Manson Construction & Engineering Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Adams v. Oregon State PoliceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. George B. Wallace Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Oksenholt v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API