Legal Opinion
Scott v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 3, 2002No. 49A02-0202-CR-138PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Judge.
Scoey Scott appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from his automobile. We reverse.
Issue
Scott raises a single issue for our review, which we restate as follows: whether the trial court properly denied his motion to suppress evidence seized from his unoccupied automobile.
Facts and Procedural History
On July 14, 2001, Officer Alan Hopkins responded to a call of individuals smoking marijuana at a school playground. When he arrived at the scene he found Scott and two other individuals sitting on a bench. There were also three additional…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Overstreet v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Edwards v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Traylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Scott v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Cheatham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Marlowe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. RagerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.