Legal Opinion
Burton v. Schweiker
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 14, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-1570PublishedCited by 544 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TEITELBAUM, District Judge.
This is an action brought under 42 U.S. C.A. § 405(g) to review the Secretary’s final decision denying plaintiff Vernice Burton’s claim for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment; plaintiff in the alternative asks that this case be remanded to the Secretary for further findings. After careful consideration of the record, this Court concludes that the Secretary’s motion for summary judgment must be granted.
The plaintiff filed her present application for disability benefits…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Leo R. Smith v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- James Hess, Jr. v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Eugene A. Hargenrader v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Stanley Stancavage v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by544 opinions
- Santise v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Myers v. BerryhillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Santise v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Rosa v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
- Adams v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
539 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.