Legal Opinion
Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Philadelphia v. Portner
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 9, 1953No. 10802PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The complaint recites the following allegations, which, since the complaint was dismissed as insufficient in law, must be taken to be true.
The plaintiff, Central-Penn National Bank of Philadelphia, a national banking association, on November 29, 1951, entered into a written agreement of consolidation with the City National Bank of Philadelphia under the charter and title of the plaintiff. See 12 U.S.C.A. §§ 33-34a. The execution of the agreement of consolidation was announced in news articles in the Philadelphia newspapers of November 29 and 30, 1951, and was duly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Park & Tilford, Inc. v. SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Guessefeldt v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glenn R. Mahone and Harvey L. Mahone v. David S. Waddle, Albert B. Ellway, Jr. And the City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Bache & Co. v. General Instrument Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Mark H. Berens v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the Currency, and Marquette Bank, N.A., as Successor in Interest to Marquette Bank Shakopee, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Marks v. Autocar Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Philadelphia v. PortnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.