Legal Opinion

In re Harenberg

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 8, 2013No. Nos. 10-23223-RAG, 10-23222-RAGPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION IN SUPPORT OF ORDER DENYING DEBTORS’ MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL

ROBERT A. GORDON, Bankruptcy Judge.

1. Introduction

Pending before the Court is the Debtors’ Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (Motion for Stay) (Dkt. No. 132) filed on December 3, 2012.1 The U.S. Trustee (UST) filed its Opposition to Debtors’ Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (Dkt. No. 140) by the deadline agreed upon by the parties and the matter is now ripe for decision.2

The Motion for Stay seeks to bring the underlying bankruptcy proceeding to a full stop while the Debtors’ appeal three orders. Each order was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  4. Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. In Re 266 Washington AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API