Legal Opinion

Osborn v. Martha's Vineyard Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 11, 1886PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

This action was originally commenced by Samuel Osborn, Jr., one of the plaintiffs. After the trial of the case, Osborn moved to amend his writ by adding, as joint plaintiffs with him, Shubael L. Norton and Nathaniel M. Jernegan, which motion was allowed. The action then proceeded upon the allegation in their declaration, that the defendant owed the three plaintiffs $600, according to the account annexed, which was for twenty tons of iron rails at $30 per ton, giving credit for $400, paid to Norton and Jernegan.

The first question which arises is whether the contract made by the plaintiffs with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  2. Decker v. R. S. LivingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1818

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kosior v. Continental Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Willett v. WebsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Hathaway v. Orient InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Childs v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Squires v. Inhabitants of AmherstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API