Legal Opinion

Shelley v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 8, 1937No. 4 Div. 945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This is a bill by the purchaser of real property against the seller for specific performance of the contract to convey.

The demurrer of the defendant, questions the equity of the bill and the sufficiency of its averments in several respects, notably, that the contract is void for its uncertainty in the description of the land; that the contract is violative of the statutes of frauds, and that the bill seeks specific performance of a contract other than that entered into by the parties. A copy of the contract is made an exhibit to the bill and appears in the statement of the case…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chambers v. RingstaffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Minge v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Karter v. EastSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Nolen v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Penney v. NortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Shacklette v. DrawdyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Wilson v. LeavinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API