Legal Opinion

Beery v. Grace Drilling

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1993No. 92-488PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the Workers’ Compensation Court, the Honorable Timothy W. Reardon presiding. The Workers’ Compensation Court determined that the claimant, Danny Beery (Beery), was not entitled to receive domiciliary care benefits, nor was he entitled to his costs, attorney’s fees, or a penalty. We affirm.

In his brief, Beery raises issues concerning equitable estoppel, waiver, breach of contract, judicial estoppel, attorney’s fees and costs, and statutory penalties. For reasons discussed below, however, the only issue before this Court is whether the Workers’…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dagel v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Teesdale v. Anschutz Drilling CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Akhtar v. Van De WeteringMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Carlson v. CainMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Kenneth D. Collins Agency v. HagerottMontana Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Billings Post No. 1634 v. Montana Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Selley v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Latray v. Osorio St. PeterMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Marriage of MeyerMontana Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API