Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Perryman

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1932No. 29596PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.

Perryman, the appellee, sued the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, the appellant, on a contract of accident insurance. The policy of insurance was made an exhibit to the declaration. A demurrer was interposed thereto and was overruled by the court, and the case proceeded to trial, resulting in a judgment for the amount of the demand, from which appeal is prosecuted by the casualty company.

The contract undertook to insure appellee “against loss resulting solely from bodily injuries, effected directly and independently of all other causes, through accidental means (excluding suicide, sane or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Modern Woodmen of America v. MilesIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Westmoreland v. Preferred Acc. Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. FosterMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Mary H. Whetsell, Individually and as of the Estate of Kenneth A. Whetsell, Deceased v. The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. Reid v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1977
  5. Barkerding v. Ætna Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API