Legal Opinion

Barlow v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1895No. 1718PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

This action was brought to have a special assessment for the improvement of a street declared void, and to restrain its collection. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, and the city has appealed.

Under the decision of this court in the case of Buckley v. Tacoma, 9 Wash. 253 (37 Pac. 441), the city failed to obtain any jurisdiction in the premises under the notice given, but the plaintiffs in this action, with the exception of Theodore Hosmer, saw fit to appear in *33said proceeding and remonstrate against the prosecution of the work,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buckley v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. City of Yakima v. SnivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Wingate v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Edmonds Land Co. v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Tacoma Land Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API