Legal Opinion
Kapil v. Apple, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 8, 2025No. 5:24-cv-09304Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SANDEEP KAPIL, et al., Case No. 24-cv-09304-NW 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 APPLE, INC., Re: ECF No. 32 Defendant. 11 12 13 On March 7, 2025, Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple” or “Defendant”) filed a motion to 14 dismiss Plaintiffs’ class action complaint. Mot., ECF No. 32. Having considered the parties’ 15 briefs and the relevant legal authority, the Court concluded that oral argument was not required, 16 see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and vacated the hearing set for July 9, 2025. The Court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.