Legal Opinion · Dissent

National Labor Relations Board v. Creative Food Design Ltd., T/a the Broker, Hotel & Restaurant Employees Local 25, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 26, 1988No. 87-1235Published

1DissentStarr, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. Although I agree with my colleagues that substantial evidence supports the Board’s findings that the Company violated the federal labor laws, I would remand' the remedial aspect of the case, inasmuch as the Board failed to consider a highly relevant factor in determining what constituted the appropriate remedy.

Preliminarily, I note my agreement with the Company’s plea that Board-sponsored elections are as a general matter to be preferred to authorization cards. In addition, there is no doubt that employers, if they insist, enjoy the right to demand an election, even…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Ship Shape Maintenance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API