National Labor Relations Board v. Creative Food Design Ltd., T/a the Broker, Hotel & Restaurant Employees Local 25, Afl-Cio, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentStarr, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent. Although I agree with my colleagues that substantial evidence supports the Board’s findings that the Company violated the federal labor laws, I would remand' the remedial aspect of the case, inasmuch as the Board failed to consider a highly relevant factor in determining what constituted the appropriate remedy.
Preliminarily, I note my agreement with the Company’s plea that Board-sponsored elections are as a general matter to be preferred to authorization cards. In addition, there is no doubt that employers, if they insist, enjoy the right to demand an election, even…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Ship Shape Maintenance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.