Legal Opinion

Paul Jones & Co. v. Lucas

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided August 1, 1929No. 1049PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

This case is submitted on plaintiff’s demurrer to paragraph 4 of defendant’s amended answer. This paragraph challenges the right of the plaintiff to rely upon the fact that the taxes assessed against it for the calendar year 1919 were collected by duress after their collection had been barred by the statute of limitation then in effect, inasmuch as this fact was not presented to the Commissioner in the application for refund as one of the grounds for claiming such refund. There is thus presented the question of whether a taxpayer may base an action for the recovery of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wickwire v. ReineckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. LucasDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. F. W. Fitch Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1943
  2. Biermann v. SheaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  3. New York Handkerchief Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  4. Henry Prentiss & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  5. Aladdin Co. v. WoodworthDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API