Legal Opinion

Kroiz v. United States Fire Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1975No. Appeal, No. 738PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for judgment on the pleadings1 in an assumpsit action.2 For the reasons stated hereinafter we affirm.

Briefly stated the facts are as follows: the appellant, Kroiz, [hereinafter A] won a verdict in an action against B. B posted an appeal bond on which the appellee, United States Fire Insurance Company, [hereinafter C] appeared as surety. B lost on appeal but did not pay the judgment, and A brought this action against C on the bond. These facts, alleged in A’s complaint, were admitted by C in its answer, and on these facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. West Side Belt Railroad v. Pittsburgh Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Brock's Assigned Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Layman v. Continental Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Pittsburg Construction Co. v. West Side Belt RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dobryndia v. Dobryndia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1986
  2. Perlman v. Perlman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1984
  3. Posega v. Gazda, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Forest County1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API