Kroiz v. United States Fire Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Jacobs, J.,
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for judgment on the pleadings1 in an assumpsit action.2 For the reasons stated hereinafter we affirm.
Briefly stated the facts are as follows: the appellant, Kroiz, [hereinafter A] won a verdict in an action against B. B posted an appeal bond on which the appellee, United States Fire Insurance Company, [hereinafter C] appeared as surety. B lost on appeal but did not pay the judgment, and A brought this action against C on the bond. These facts, alleged in A’s complaint, were admitted by C in its answer, and on these facts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- West Side Belt Railroad v. Pittsburgh Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Brock's Assigned Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Layman v. Continental Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Pittsburg Construction Co. v. West Side Belt RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.