Legal Opinion

Clifford J. Johnson v. Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 27, 1988No. 87-2566PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Appellant, a resident of California, alleges that the implementation of United States strategic defense policy, specifically Launch on Warning (“LOW”), 1 is unconstitutional. Appellant asserts that LOW relies on “error-prone[d]” computers for its implementation, thus increasing the likelihood that nuclear missiles will be launched prior to a positive, human identification of a nuclear attack on the United States. He asserts that LOW deprives him of due process and that LOW deprives the President and Congress of their constitutional prerogatives regarding commencement and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
  2. Jeffrey Nielsen v. Ryan ThornellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. The Women's Resource Network v. GourleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
  4. Republic of the Marshall Islands v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. American Federation of Teachers v. DeVosDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API