Legal Opinion

Bailey v. American Research Bureau

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 4, 2025No. 3:24-cv-05482Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 TRACEY K BAILEY, Case No. 3:24-cv-05482-TMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 9 MOTION TO DISMISS v. 10 AMERICAN RESEARCH BUREAU; 11 DAVID SCHWARTZ, 12 Defendant. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Pro se Plaintiff Tracey Bailey asserts claims of negligence, fraud, misrepresentation, and 16 breach of fiduciary duty arising from her allegation that Defendants American Research Bureau 17 (“ARB”) and David Schwartz assigned themselves partial interest to Ms. Bailey’s inheritance. 18 Defendants move to dismiss Ms.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Nadia Naffe v. John FreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Smith v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Robert E. Kelly Virginia L. Kelly v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Robert J. Pachinger v. Mgm Grand Hotel-Las Vegas, Inc., and Does I Through V, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API