People v. Lanterman
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. W. McKinley, Earl Rogers, Paul W. Schenck, and O’Melveny, Stevens & Millikin, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Defendant was charged by indictment with the commission of the crime specified in section 72 of the Penal Code, and upon trial was convicted as charged. He appeals from the judgment and an order of the court denying his motion for a new trial.
Defendant interposed a demurrer to the indictment upon the grounds, among others, that the indictment did not substantially conform to sections 950, 951 and 952 of the Penal Code, and that the facts stated in the indictment did not constitute a public offense. This demurrer was overruled.
The parts of the indictment material to a consideration of the case…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. Ah BeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Sill v. ReeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Branham v. Mayor & Common CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- People v. MahonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. KeelinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People v. KnottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. KernanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Batcheller v. WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- People v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.