Legal Opinion
Steinke v. SC DEPT. OF LABOR, LICENSING
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided September 7, 1999No. 24999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
336 S.C. 373 (1999)
520 S.E.2d 142
Mike STEINKE and Mary Steinke, individually and as personal representatives of the estate of Zachary Steinke; and Linda Nash Given, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Michael Nash, Respondents,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION, Appellant.
No. 24999.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Heard May 12, 1999.
Decided September 7, 1999.
Rehearing Denied October 6, 1999.
Andrew F. Lindemann, William H. Davidson, II, and David L. Morrison of Davidson, Morrison and Lindemann, P.A., Columbia, for appellant.
John Kassel and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited53 opinions
- McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Leake v. CainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Ludwick v. This Minute of Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kiriakides v. Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Charleston Elec. Servs., Inc. v. RahallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019