Craps v. Mercury Construction Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
Appellant Broyles appeals from an order denying its motions to be stricken as a defendant and to file a late answer. We affirm.
Respondent Kathleen Craps amended her complaint 23 months after commencement of this action by adding appellant as a defendant.
Appellant first asserts the trial court abused its discretion in denying its motion to be stricken as a defendant because respondent amended her complaint, adding appellant as party defendant, without order of the court and outside the time period allowed under § 15-13-910, Code of Laws of S. C. (1976). We disagree.
The trial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Morgan v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Anderson v. Toledo Scale Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Thermal Insulation Co. v. Town & Campus, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
3Cited by4 opinions
- Y. C. Ballenger Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Reach-All Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- McLaughlin v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
- Estate of Moon Ex Rel. Gregory v. City of GreerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Holman v. Warwick Furnace Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995