Legal Opinion

Wilmer-Hutchins Independent School District v. Smiley

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided January 8, 2003No. 05-02-00728-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice BRIDGES.

Wilmer-Hutchins Independent School District (the District) appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding Judith Smiley, individually and d/b/a JT2 Enterprises, and Diana Newton-Grayson damages on their promissory estoppel and quantum meruit claims. In five issues, the District argues Smiley and Newton-Grayson cannot recover under either of their implied contract causes of action because an express contract existed between the parties, promissory estoppel cannot be asserted against the District in its exercise of governmental powers, the evidence is insufficient…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heldenfels Bros. v. City of Corpus ChristiTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Remington Arms Co., Inc. v. CaldwellTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Frost National Bank v. Burge, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  5. McIntyre v. Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Toshiba MacHine Co. v. SPM Flow Control, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Reiff v. Roy, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  3. Johnson v. Dallas County, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  4. In Re RoseTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dominion Oklahoma Texas Exploration & Production, Inc. v. Faulconer Energy Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API