Legal Opinion

In Re Lane

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 1935No. 25714PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

Accusation was filed against C. T. Lane, a member of the State Bar of Oklahoma, wherein it was alleged that he had been guilty of unprofessional conduct by: (1) accepting $25 for cost deposit from J ohn Luther Marlin and appropriating same to big own use; (2) filing in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma a forged poverty affidavit on behalf of John Luther Marlin; (3) filing in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma a forged poverty affidavit on behalf of Clarence A. Duckworth.

The charges were heard by the administrative…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Dabney v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re HadwigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API