City of Erlanger v. American Isowall Corp.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
HAYES, Chief Judge.
In these appeals which were heard together, we are asked to determine whether an industrial plant may maintain an action to invalidate an annexation ordinance which fails to comply with the criteria of KRS 81.280, when said plant has not filed a remonstrance suit within the thirty (30) day statute of limitations set forth in KRS 81.-110.
The facts of the first case, City of Erlanger v. American Isowall Corporation et al. follow. Erlanger, a city of the third class, enacted Ordinance # 1614 on February 15, 1977 in which it proposed to annex an unincorporated area in which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ridings v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Carrithers v. City of ShelbyvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- City of Owensboro v. Board of Trustees, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Garner v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- O'Hara v. City of South Fort MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Liquor Outlet, LLC v. Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
- Copper Hills Enterprises, Ltd. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Merritt v. City of CampbellsvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
- Williams v. City of HillviewKentucky Supreme Court · 1992