Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 31, 2008No. Civil Action 06-11053-GAOPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

O’TOOLE, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, survivors of a terrorist attack by Hamas, sued the Islamic Republic of Iran in the District Court for the District of Columbia alleging that Iran was liable for the attacks because it provided material support to Hamas. The plaintiffs obtained a default judgment which included $71.5 million in compensatory damages and $37.5 million in punitive damages. The plaintiffs .registered their judgment with this Court and moved to attach by trustee process certain antiquities alleged to the be property of Iran but actually held in the custody of several…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Rubin v. the Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Rubin v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. Rubin v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  4. Levin v. 650 Fifth Avenue CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API