Legal Opinion

Jones v. City of Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Messrs. F. A. Sondley and J. H. Merrimon, for plaintiff. Mr. Charles M. Steelman, fqr defendant (appellant).

1Opinion of the Court

Clauk, J.:

In this cause no appeal bond appears to have been given, and the appellee moves to dismiss. The 'defendant presented no good excuse for the failure, but 'offered to file the bond here. In Harrison v. Hoff, 102 N. C., 25, it was held that the discretion vested in this Court by ch. 135, Acts 1889, to permit an appeal bond to bo filed here would not be exercised unless the appellant shows a reasonable excuse for his failure to give the under taking below as required by The Code, §§549 and 552. In that case MerrimoN, J., said: “Whether the power will or will not be exercised must depend…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harrison v. . HoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vivian v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Hawkins v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Hawkins v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Waynesville Transportation Co. v. Waynesville Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API