Legal Opinion

Forsythe v. Kluckhohn

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 7, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Plymouth District Court. — Non. David Mould, Judge. Action for damages resulted in judgment against defendant, from which he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, J.:

In the afternoon of November 4, 1908, the plaintiff, while walking along Fifth Street in Le Mars, noticed the approach of two dogs from the opposite direction. She stepped aside to avoid them, but, according to her testimony, they seized her clothes, pulled her around • and caused her to fall. • Other evidence tended to show that neither dog bit nor took hold of her dress, but that one of the dogs ran against her, causing her to lose her balance. The smaller of these was a yellow dog, and the other, a brindle, was a pup belonging to defendant. The jury in answer to special…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tackett v. Taylor CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Sowles v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1893
  3. Hardiman v. WholleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  4. State v. DonohueSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
  5. Tingle v. C., B. & Q. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carlson v. MeusbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. McDowell v. Interstate Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Forsythe v. KluckhohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API