Legal Opinion

Birmingham v. Mirrington

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Samuel J. Harris, Official Referee.

By petition dated January 5, 1953, the petitioner has brought a proceeding under the provisions of article 78 of the Civil Practice Act for an order directing the respondents to continue the petitioner on the payroll of the City of Niagara Falls and to pay him certain amounts of money which he claims as hack salary by reasons of the requirements of section 207-a of the General Municipal Law of the State of New York, The petition contains a further request for “ such other and further relief as is just and proper ”,

This proceeding has been referred to me to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. ColeNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Tyler v. GadwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robida v. MirringtonNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Devens v. GokeyNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Birmingham v. MirringtonNew York Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API