Legal Opinion
Robida v. Mirrington
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRegis O’Brien, J.
This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. It was heard at Lockport, Niagara County, New York, on September 27, 1955.
The final brief for the respondents was received January 26th and the amended answer on February 8, 1956.
*969The petitioner seeks an order directing the City of Niagara Falls to restore him to the benefits provided for a disabled fireman under section 207-a of the General Municipal Law, said benefits having been discontinued February 1, 1953.
Section 207-a provides, in part, that any paid fireman of a fire department of a city of less than one million…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Birmingham v. MirringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Robinson v. ColeNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Birmingham v. MirringtonNew York Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by8 opinions
- MATTER OF THEROUX v. ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Menendez v. Faber, Coe & Gregg, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Klonowski v. Department of FireNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- King v. City of NewburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Weber v. Department of Fire of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.