Legal Opinion

Simonds v. Noland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1927No. 19782. En BancPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, C. J.

The appellant filed a complaint against the respondent in which he alleged that, on February 19, 1924, the respondent had executed to the appellant a promissory note in the sum of five hundred forty dollars which, had not been paid according to its terms, and asked judgment for that amount, together with an attorney’s fee. The respondent answered admitting the execution of the note, and as a first affirmative defense alleged that it was without consideration; as a second affirmative defense, that, on February 19, 1923, the respondent was a stockholder in the Walla Walla Texas Oil Company;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kom v. Cody Detective Agency, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Duddy-Robinson Co. v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State Ex Rel. Howland v. Olympia Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Yeaton v. Eagle Oil & Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Krisch v. Inter-State Fisheries Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Culbertson'sCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1934
  3. Brumfield v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Northern Texas Telephone Co. v. City of ShermanDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1933
  5. Thompson v. LeggettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API