Legal Opinion

J. Weingarten, Inc. v. Sandefer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1973No. 7442PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

Although subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Laws, defendant was not a subscriber and did not carry Workmen’s Compensation Insurance. Plaintiff sustained injuries in the course of her employment with defendant and brought suit to recover her damages, alleging negligence on the part of the defendant which proximately caused her injury. § 1, Art. 8306, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. Based upon the jury verdict, the trial court rendered judgment for plaintiff and this appeal follows.

Defendant operated a supermarket and plaintiff was employed as a clerk in the non-food department thereof.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Seideneck v. Cal Bayreuther AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Roosth & Genecov Production Co. v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Brookshire Bros., Inc. v. Lewis, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1999
  3. Forrest v. Vital Earth Resources, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. Chemical Express Carriers, Inc. v. Pina, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991
  5. The Kroger Co. v. Keng, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API