Legal Opinion
Gene Fink v. Continental Foundry & Machine Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 25, 1957No. 11693PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
240 F.2d 369
Gene FINK, Jerome Finkelstein, Charlotte Fink, Max Blumenfeld and Gene Fink, as co-partners, Lloyd M. Blumenthal, Jack and Esther Blumenthal, Philip Goodman, and Martin Goodman, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CONTINENTAL FOUNDRY & MACHINE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Jay T. Osler, J. H. Briggs, Kent B. Hall, Grier Patterson, J. H. Rose, Earl Steward, and William E. Troutman, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11618.
No. 11693.
United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.
January 3, 1957.
Rehearing Denied February 25, 1957.
1
Samuel Morgan, Norman Handelsman, Chicago, Ill., Cecil B. Cohen, East…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Porter v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- American Book Co. v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. El-O-Pathic Pharmacy United States v. Hudson Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Hyams v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hazzard v. Westview Golf Club, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Christopher Porco v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006