Legal Opinion
Laidler v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 8, 1993No. 92-1482PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
627 So.2d 1263 (1993)
Euriell LAIDLER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-1482.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
December 8, 1993.
Nelson E. Bailey, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
FARMER, Judge.
This case involves the intentional and purposeful use of peremptory challenges to exclude women during jury selection in a criminal case. The issue is whether the logic of Batson[1] or Neil[2] applies to women as a discrete group. We hold that it does and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- United States v. Juana Espericueta De GrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Juana Espericueta De GrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Joseph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Langon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.