Legal Opinion

United States v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1988No. Nos. 87-5100 to 87-5105PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge:

This is a consolidated appeal from the district court’s determination that the government met its burden of presenting racially neutral explanations for the use of its peremptory challenges during the selection of the jury for defendants’ trial. The district court, after an evidentiary hearing, found that the defendants had established a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination, but that the government’s reasons for using its peremptory challenges satisfied the standards expressed in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed. 2d 69 (1986). We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. TiptonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. RoaneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Juana Espericueta De GrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API