Legal Opinion
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 26, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01842Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION MARY ANN ROBERTSON, Case No.: 3:18-cv-01842-SAL Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of PAUL E. CRUISE, Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER ON COVIL CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., et al., Defendants, Before the court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Covil Corporation (“Covil”) as to all claims asserted by Plaintiff Mary Ann Robertson, individually and as executrix of the estate of Paul Cruise. [ECF No. 386]. Plaintiff alleges that her deceased father,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Benjamin H. Blackston, Wilmer L. Ring, John N. Turner, James N. Tanksley and Foster G. Hickox v. Shook and Fletcher Insulation Co., Ac & S, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.