State v. Johnson
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Justice.
Appeal from a conviction of automobile homicide. 1 Affirmed.
Defendant stakes his appeal upon an interpretation of the statute, aptly urging the focal point of this case when he says, “there is only one issue * * *. What degree of negligence is necessary to convict a person under * * * 76-30-7.4?”
It is contended that the phrase, “reckless, negligent or careless,” is the counterpart and/or synonymous with the follow-up disjunctive phrase found in the same sentence which interdicts the operation of a vehicle in a “wanton or reckless disregard of human life or safety.” The latter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. McMahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Kallnbach v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- State v. ThatcherUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Miller v. Southern Pac. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1933
- Stevenson v. Salt Lake City CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HazelwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BrennanUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. RitchieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- People v. McKeeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ketchum, Konkel, Barrett, Nickel & Austin v. Heritage Mountain Development Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.