Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1961No. 9480PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a conviction of automobile homicide. 1 Affirmed.

Defendant stakes his appeal upon an interpretation of the statute, aptly urging the focal point of this case when he says, “there is only one issue * * *. What degree of negligence is necessary to convict a person under * * * 76-30-7.4?”

It is contended that the phrase, “reckless, negligent or careless,” is the counterpart and/or synonymous with the follow-up disjunctive phrase found in the same sentence which interdicts the operation of a vehicle in a “wanton or reckless disregard of human life or safety.” The latter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. McMahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Kallnbach v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  3. State v. ThatcherUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Miller v. Southern Pac. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Stevenson v. Salt Lake City CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HazelwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BrennanUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. RitchieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  4. People v. McKeeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Ketchum, Konkel, Barrett, Nickel & Austin v. Heritage Mountain Development Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API