Legal Opinion

Andrews v. City of Butte

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1944No. 8393PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

Plaintiff brought this suit against the city of Butte, alleging in his amended complaint that he fell on a broken sidewalk within the city and suffered injuries by reason of the fall. In his amended complaint he sets out that the' city of Butte had actual knowledge of the dangerous condition of the defective sidewalk. He gave after his injury the written notice required by section 5080, Revised Codes, 1935, as amended by Laws 1937, Chapter 122. Upon the trial he offered proof that he had talked with Frank Curran, the city engineer, concerning the condition of the sidewalk in question, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Kelley v. CurtissNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Union Bankers Ins. Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  4. Powers v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Ratliff v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API