Legal Opinion

Parnes v. Hibbs

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1959No. Appeals, 309 and 310PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wood side, J.,

This is an amicable Action to Quiet Title brought pursuant to Pa. R. C. P. 1061(b)(2) to determine whether the plaintiffs had valid liens on premises 333 Elwood Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa.

On September 1, 1944, the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company conveyed the premises to Max Polonsky and Rose Polonsky, his wife, trustees for Ida Polonsky. The trust provided that the trustee had the right to use and occupy or to rent the premises and to pay the income to themselves, and upon the death of the survivor title to the premises was to vest in Ida Polonsky, their daughter.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Commonwealth Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Gordon v. ReesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Drysdale's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
  4. Estate of PalmSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Evergreen Memorial Park Association, Bankrupt. Blanche Smith PetersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  2. Fulton v. DuroIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Clairton Corp. v. Chicago Title InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API