Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Mulholland Co. v. Nowak

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1917Published

Application for a writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

An alternative writ of mandamus was granted requiring the common council of the city of Dunkirk to audit and pay the bill of the relator amounting to $6,700 for the sale of a motor-chemical-fire apparatus. The respondents, the common council of the city of Dunkirk, served an answer. By stipulation the present councillors are substituted as parties defendant. The issues presented by the writ and answer were tried before the court, a jury being waived. The following facts appear:

The common council of the city of Dunkirk consists of five members, one of whom is elected from the city at large and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hines v. . the City of LockportNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. The People Ex Rel. Dannat v. . ComptrollerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. In re the Extension of Church StreetNew York Supreme Court · 1867
  4. People ex rel. Locke v. Common Council of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1871
  5. People ex rel. McSpedon v. Stout, County TreasurerNew York Supreme Court · 1856

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API