Carter v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
September Term, 1982.]
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
The question presented in these two appeals is whether the unavailability of judicial resources on the scheduled date of trial constitutes good cause for postponement under Article 27, section 591 of the Maryland Code and the corresponding Maryland Rule 746.
The two appellants contend that the charges against them should have been dismissed because their trials were not held in accordance with the time limitation and the good cause requirement of Section 591 and Maryland Rule 746.
Section 591 (a) provides:
"Within two weeks after the arraignment of a person accused of a criminal offense, or…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Epps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Goins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SchaafArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Reimsnider v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Larsen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- State v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984