Legal Opinion
Vallejo v. Berryhill
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 28, 2017No. 15-1283PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORITZ, Circuit Judge.
The Acting Commissioner appeals the district court’s order reversing her decision to deny Marla Vallejo’s application for supplemental security income benefits and remanding the case for further administrative proceedings. Because the district court’s order rests on a misapplication of controlling law, we reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings.
Background
Vallejo applied for supplemental security income benefits in April 2010, alleging she had been disabled since November 2009. After the agency administratively denied her claim, she received a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Watkins v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Quang v. NGUYEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Carr v. Commissioner, SSACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Medina v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Allen v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022
- Anasco v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
- Anderson v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.