Legal Opinion

Anasco v. Saul

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 26, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00410Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CHARLES B. A., an individual Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Case No. 2:19-CV-410 TS Social Security, District Judge Ted Stewart Defendant, This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Charles B. A.’s appeal from the decision of the Social Security Administration denying his application for disability insurance benefits. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will affirm the Commissioner’s decision. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court’s review of the administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Danny CLIFTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. Keyes-Zachary v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. Watkins v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. James Sample v. Richard Schweiker , Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API