Legal Opinion
Carl Attaway Parks and Bernice Parks v. Will Poindexter v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 27, 1984No. 82-8517PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUMBAULD, District Judge:
Plaintiffs on December 14, 1978, filed a diversity action for damages caused by collision of husband plaintiff’s paint truck with an auto carrier driven by defendant Will Poindexter. Husband plaintiff claimed medical expenses, and lost wages, and diminished earning capacity; wife plaintiff claimed loss of conjugal companionship.
In addition to Poindexter, various other parties were named as defendants: Ray Patterson, doing business as Ray Patterson Motors, a motor carrier; Central Indiana Leasing (a corporation set up by Patterson which owned the tractor and had leased…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith MacHinery Company, Inc. v. Hesston CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Lee v. Criterion InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1987
- Navelski v. International Paper Co.District Court, N.D. Florida · 2017