Paulk v. King
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Bullock. Tried before the Hon. Jesse M. Carmichael. The facts of this case are substantially the same as on the former appeal. — King v. Paulk, 85 Ala. 186. The charge of the court was in favor of the plaintiff, and that charge is assigned as error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.
This case was brought to this court by appeal at the last term. The only question raised by the present record was then decided. Upon remandment of the cause, the Circuit Court followed the rulings of this court in giving the charge requested by the plaintiff. This being the only error assigned by the appellant, the judgment is *333affirmed on the authority of King v. Paulk, 85 Ala. 186; Fitzgerald v. Williamson, 85 Ala. 585, and cases cited.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- King v. PaulkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Fitzgerald v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
3Cited by6 opinions
- Griffin v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Troy v. Walter Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Chambers v. HuntonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Crawford Merc. Co. v. AndertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Harris v. HancheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.