Fairburn Banking Co. v. Summerlin

1. There was no complaint that any error of law was committed on the trial. The only question dealt with in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error is decided in the following notes.

2. The mere fact that the purchaser at an administrator’s sale was the son of the administrator was not of itself sufficient to render the sale void. Such relationship was a circumstance which could be considered, in connection with other facts and circumstances, in determining whether the sale was collusive and fraudulent. Cain v. McGeenty, 41 Minn. 194 (42 N. W. 933).

3. The reasoning in the cases of…