Legal Opinion

Head v. Scruggs

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1934No. 9470PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. “A purchase by a husband at a sale had by his wife as administratrix is voidable at the election of heirs of the intestate, who move within a reasonable time after the sale to set the same aside.” Lowery v. Idleson, 117 Ga. 778 (2) (45 S. E. 51); Broadhurst v. Hill, 137 Ga. 833 (3) (74 S. E. 422); DeVaughn v. Griffith, 149 Ga. 697 (101 S. E. 794). Moore v. Carey, 116 Ga. 28 (42 S. E. 258).- This accords with the principle that “an administrator who is an heir at law of his intestate, and as such has an interest in the property sold, may purphase at the sale of the property of the estate,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. DaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Lowery v. IdlesonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Moore v. CareySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Wilkins v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Social Benevolent Society, No. 1 v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bank of Tifton v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API