Krebs v. Oberrender
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
These two cases were tried together in the court below ; they resulted in verdicts for plaintiff; subsequently the court entered judgments for defendants non obstante veredicto from which plaintiff has appealed.
The actions were in assumpsit, by a receiver in equity, to recover alleged unpaid stock subscriptions, due to the corporation which the court had placed in his charge. The facts giving rise to the controversy to be determined are substantially undisputed.
By articles of association, dated February 9, 1914, defendants and one other, associated themselves…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coit v. Gold Amalgamating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Shannon v. StevensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Big Spring Electric Co. v. KitzmillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Cooke v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Bole v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Zweifach v. SCRANTON LACE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Seidler v. Gayville Supply Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1927
- McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1935