Legal Opinion

Krebs v. Oberrender

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1922No. Appeals, Nos. 154 and 155PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

These two cases were tried together in the court below ; they resulted in verdicts for plaintiff; subsequently the court entered judgments for defendants non obstante veredicto from which plaintiff has appealed.

The actions were in assumpsit, by a receiver in equity, to recover alleged unpaid stock subscriptions, due to the corporation which the court had placed in his charge. The facts giving rise to the controversy to be determined are substantially undisputed.

By articles of association, dated February 9, 1914, defendants and one other, associated themselves…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coit v. Gold Amalgamating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Shannon v. StevensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Big Spring Electric Co. v. KitzmillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Cooke v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Bole v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Zweifach v. SCRANTON LACE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Seidler v. Gayville Supply Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1927
  4. McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API